![]() On the YouTube corporate side of things, the people who make YouTube what it is are real people with real families to feed with their salaries. These are real people spending real time and money making content. The only reason it’s tolerated by so many websites is because only a small sliver of users know how to install ad-blocking software. It would become paid-only or go out of business. We all know what would happen to YouTube if 100% of its users were able to block ads. That doesn't bother me as much as viewing ads or supporting the ad-based clickbait attention grabbing business model, so I think it's still a win. And supporting your creators on Patreon will give them way more money than any amount of individual YouTube viewership. In other words, I wouldn't worry so much about the very fine details. I'm happy to support businesses that give me the option to pay by doing exactly that. I find viewing ads to be an unacceptably high price, so I use an ad blocker, and I just go away if they turn me away for that.īut for places that do give a money option, like YouTube, I jump for it, as I find that to be a far more ethical business model. Many places don't allow you to pay with money, they force you to pay with ads. Speaking more broadly, there's the simple fact that people deserve to be paid for the work they do. You can find lots of discussion with a quick web search, but yes, it seems to be pretty well supported. For the purpose of this comment let's pretend that 'not monetized' satisfies whatever flimsy 'noncommercial' license declaration exists ![]() That move now retroactively looks like YouTube trying to front-run smaller creators on ad revenue, especially if something they make goes 'viral' before they can make partner. To be slightly fair to YouTube, they never added NC clauses to their Creative Commons declaration support, but I doubt that was evidence of a 10-year plan to demand monetization.īut on the other hand, they also made a huge stink about keeping Partner status out of the hands of people who shouldn't have it. Such uploads are now retroactively illegal unless you're already partnered, since YouTube now only allows partners to disable monetization. NCommander's video on the MSWord 1.0 source). There's several instances in which creators deliberately uploaded videos unmonetized under the understanding that this would comply with some kind of noncommercial licensing requirement (e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |